Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Wilt v. Maximus, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Leo Wilt
Defendant:
Maximus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Bishop v. Maximus Federal Services, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
David Bishop
Defendant:
Maximus Federal Services, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Maximus, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Linden Buzzell, Carlos Harding, Clifford Beers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
DeSantis et al v. Wilt
as 1:2022cv01775
Plaintiff:
Brooke DeSantis and William DeSantis
Defendant:
Steven V. Wilt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
DeSantis et al v. Wilt
as 8:2022cv01775
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Brooke DeSantis and Mr. William DeSantis
Defendant:
Steven V. Wilt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Andrew Dicks v. Frank Bishop, Jr.
as 22-6148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JOSEPH DICKS
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden, North Branch Correctional Institution, JEFF NINES, Assistant Warden, North Branch Correctional Institution, LIEUTENANT JASON HARBAUGH, Captain, North Branch Correctional Institution and others
Harry v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2021cv00230
Defendant:
K. Cosby, Ivan Gilmore, E. Boone and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Resper v. Wexford Medical Services, Inc.
as 21-6600
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN BROWNING, NURSE CARLA BUCK, BERNICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE RESPER
William Dixon v. Frank Bishop
as 21-6512
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY BEAN, FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden NBCI, R. S. RODERICK, CMM & Acting Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM K. DIXON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wayne Resper v. Wexford Medical Services, Inc.
as 20-7696
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN BROWNING, NURSE CARLA BUCK, BERNICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE RESPER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
