Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Little v. South Carolina Dept of Corr Cooperation et al
as 0:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corr. Corporation, Kershaw Corr. Inst., Warden James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Neal v. Vaughan
as 5:2022ct03222
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Defendant:
Warden James Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Bowman, III v. Warden James
as 21-6606
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD F.V. BOWMAN, III
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES, Warden Kershaw C.I.
Neal v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2021ct03032
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety and Warden James Vaughn
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Goss v. Bryan Stirling
as 20-7319
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN LEE PACK, BRYAN P. STIRLING, MAJOR RICHARD CHVALA and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRELL L. GOSS
Bowman v. Warden James
as 9:2020cv00666
Respondent:
Warden James
Petitioner:
Richard F.V. Bowman, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frazier v. Kindel et al
as 1:2019cv03585
Defendant:
Warden Kindel, James Blackwell, Liber Corectinal inst and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutton v. Hickman et al
as 1:2019cv03665
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Hutton
Defendant:
Warden Louis Hickman and Assistant Warden James Balderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tarone Jones v. US
as 13-6497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TARONE M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN JAMES CROSS, J. E. CROGAN, Associate Warden and others
Latif Rashe'd v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATIF RASHE'D
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, FRED SCHILLING, Medical Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, LAYTON T. LESTER, Warden, James River Correctional Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
