Cases 1 - 10 of 501
Deramus v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02166
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Petitioner:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00724
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Willie Jackson
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Battle v. Wake County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2024cv00353
Defendant:
Wake County Sheriff's Office, Willie Rowe and Unknown Surety Company
Plaintiff:
Karen A Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race)
Deramus v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03127
Defendant:
Lt. R. Miller, J. Nuna Lee, Lt. Spruill and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINSLOW v. LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
WILLIS R. WINSLOW
Defendant:
LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Byrd v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Willie Mai Byrd
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Case Opened in Error
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
