Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Cruz Ramos et al v. Precision Walls Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Carlos Manuel Cruz Ramos, Juan Fernando Cruz Ramos, Leilan Cruz Ramos and others
Defendant:
Precision Walls Inc. and EGB Drywall Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Victorio v. Garcia et al
as 1:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Xiomara Victorio
Defendant:
Sara Garcia doing business as Bride and Groom with a Broom and Larry Cisneros doing business as Bride and Groom with a Broom
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Delmy Nolasco-Diaz v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1568
Petitioner:
DELMY XIOMARA NOLASCO-DIAZ and A.L.B.N.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Bravo Gil v. L.T. Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00557
Defendant:
L.T. Services, Inc., Flores Cleaning Company, LLC and Corina Xiomara Flores-Ramos
Plaintiff:
Eudosio Tovias Bravo Gil
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Guardado v. Hunan Cafe Chen, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01501
Defendant:
Hunan Cafe Chen, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marlene Xiomara Guardado
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Steinberg v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02940
Plaintiff:
Xiomara Steinberg
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
