Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Charles Zander et al v. Tyco Fire Products LP et al
as 2:2024cv01280
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Tyco Fire Products LP, Chemguard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Zander and Patricia Zander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Zanders v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02569
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Zanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Great American Assurance Company v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv02954
Defendant:
Jaquez Joyner, Lawrence Eugene Squires, III, State of South Carolina, The and others
Plaintiff:
Great American Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Wimer v. Greene County General Circuit
as 19-2356
Defendant / Appellee:
GREENE COUNTY COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GREENE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES WIMER
Richardson v. Mills et al
as 1:2019cv01151
Defendant:
J. Crites and J. Mills
Plaintiff:
Zander Lamont Richardson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mena v. Zanders
as 8:2018cv02581
Defendant:
Dana Zanders
Plaintiff:
John Bradford Mena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richardson v. Doe
as 1:2018cv02066
Plaintiff:
Zander Lamont Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Richardson v. North Branch Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2016cv02728
Plaintiff:
Zander Lamont Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
North Branch Correctional Institution and Jeremy Crites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
