Cases 41 - 50 of 553
Lewis v. Floyd et al
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Paul Lewis
Defendant:
Donna Floyd and Young Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sigford v. Hickman et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Destiny R. Sigford
Defendant:
Eugene Hickman, Amanda Lewis, Jessica Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quamar v. Houston Housing Authority et al
as 4:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Muhamad Quamar
Defendant:
Houston Housing Authority and Keland Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. City of Tupelo et al
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Willie Lewis
Defendant:
City of Tupelo, Dustin Tutor, Sam Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Webber v. Dallas Independent School District et al
as 3:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Delorise Webber
Defendant:
Dallas Independent School District, Jesus Martinez, ELAR Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Blue Mint Pharmco, LLC et al v. Texas State Board of Pharmacy et al
as 4:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
Blue Mint Pharmco, LLC and Jona Rushin, R.Ph.
Defendant:
Texas State Board of Pharmacy, Julie Spier, R.Ph., Lori Henke, Pharm.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-60072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
