Cases 141 - 150 of 165,739
Youngblood v. Bordelon et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Ron Youngblood
Respondent:
Donnie Bordelon and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fallon v. Riverbend Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Stephan Enrique Fallon
Defendant:
Riverbend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Luther Dwayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Gutierrez
as 24-50422
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Chair Person; Pardon & Paroles, Eric J. R. Nichols, Chair Person; Texas Board Department of Criminal Justice, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Conner v. Caddo Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Albertus Conner, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Caddo Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sossamon v. Collier
as 24-10474
Petitioner:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Lightfoot v. F C I Pollock
as 1:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Chad Lightfoot
Defendant:
Warden F C I Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dingle v. Barbosa
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Defendant:
FNU Barbosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Monroe
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and Asst Warden Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
