Cases 61 - 70 of 12,604
McCarley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
William Hal McCarley
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kramer v. Vazquez et al
as 6:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Pamela P. Kramer
Defendant:
Eric Vazquez, Michael Gonzales, Scott Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mayo
Defendant:
William Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verlander v. Aransas County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Adam Wayne Verlander
Defendant:
Aransas County Sheriffs Dept, Sheriff William Mills, Armando Chapa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prescott (PS) v. Pruitt et al
as 6:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Myron J. Pruitt, Daniel Choate, Homero Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Steen et al
as 5:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jason Perkins
Defendant:
Daniel Steen, FNU Peyan, Erin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
William Dexter White and George Edward Tustin, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Garthe Parker and others
Interested Party:
Joseph J Genovesi and Jason David Sheedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prestage v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
William Allen Prestage
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
