Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 166,011
USA v. Castillo-Rubio
as 24-50499
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Luis Guillermo Castillo-Rubio, also known as Pariente, also known as Guillermo Castillo-Rubio, also known as Don Jose
Banks v. Hooper
as 24-30387
Petitioner: Brian K. Banks
Respondent: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Gibson v. Bickham
as 24-30389
Petitioner: Clarence Otis Gibson
Respondent: Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Wolfford v. Lumpkin
as 24-40438
Petitioner: Nickolas Wolfford
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Johnson v. Fredricks et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff: R Wayne Johnson
Defendant: Bruce Fredricks, Norbert N Kwelle, FNU Onwukne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia-Salinas v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00574
Petitioner: Mauricio Garcia-Salinas
Respondent: United States of America and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cannnon v. Marksville
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff: Shannon Cannon
Defendant: Police Dept City of Marksville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. State Of Texas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv02325
Petitioner: Cameron Michael Moon
Respondent: State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00994
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sellers v. Macdill et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff: Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant: Justin Macdill, Carol Bradford, Chris Carr and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?