Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Shelton v. GS Physician Services, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T. Shelton
Defendant:
GS Physician Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose Walter, et al v. Horseshoe Casino & Hotel
as 11-30867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSE WALTER and SYLVESTER SHELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
HORSESHOE ENTERTAINMENT
Shelton Modelist v. Angelica Hernandez, et al
as 11-20618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELTON R MODELIST
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELICA M. HERNANDEZ, WILLIAM R BURKE, JR., LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR and others
Phares v. Phares et al
as 1:2011cv00403
Plaintiff:
Rhett Banker Phares
Defendant:
Harry Banker Phares, Belinda Sharron Welch-Phares, Saeed A Ally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk v. Shelton
as 4:2011cv02750
Plaintiff:
Roderick E Kirk, Sr.
Defendant:
Ellen L Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter et al v. Horseshoe Casino & Hotel
as 5:2011cv00463
Defendant:
Horseshoe Entertainment
Plaintiff:
Rose Walter and Sylvester Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Modelist v. Hernandez et al
as 4:2011cv00387
Plaintiff:
Shelton R Modelist
Defendant:
Angelica M. Hernandez , William R Burke, Jr , Linebarger Goggan Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry et al v. Pastorek et al
as 2:2010cv04049
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Berry , Leskisher Luckett , Kelly Fischer and others
Defendant:
Paul Pastorek, Louisiana Department of Education and Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1412
Lenz v. Tate County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2010cv00179
Plaintiff:
Larry Lenz
Defendant:
Tate County, Mississippi, Tate County Sheriff's Department, Brad Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shelton Modelist v. Gray Miller, et al
as 10-20432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELTON R MODELIST
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAY H. MILLER, LINDSAY LEE LAMBERT, CHALISE R. STOVALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
