Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Ellis v. WellsFargo Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00177
Plaintiff: Willie H. Ellis
Defendant: WellsFargo Bank, Yale University, CaixaBank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stewart v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10111
Plaintiff / Appellee: Albert G. Hill, III, individually, and as a Beneficiary of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, derivatively on behalf of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, individually, As a beneficiary of the Haroldson Lafayette Hunt Jr. Trust Estate, and derivately on Be
Defendant / Appellee: William Schilling, individually and in his capacity as a member of the Advisory Board MHTE and a member of the Advisory Board of the HHTE, Ivan Irwin, Jr., Alinda H. Wikert and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Marco Antonio Montemayor, Esq. and Kenneth Robert Stewart, Jr., also known as Kenneth R. Stewart, Jr.
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Guardino v. Hart We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-20278
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kristin Guardino
Defendant / Appellee: Jim Hart, Sean H. McCarthy, John Eddie Williams, Jr. and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Cahill et al v. Faia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00543
Plaintiff: Vivian S. Cahilll, Estate of Sandra Gardner (through its personal representative), Michael H. Gardner, Michael H Gardner and others
Respondent: Gregory G Faia, Vernon H. Decossas, III, Faia & Associates, LLC and others
Defendant: ADS Squared, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Guardino v. Hart et al
as 4:2021cv03721
Plaintiff: Kristin Guardino
Defendant: Jim Hart, Sean H McCarthy, John Eddie Williams, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. United Health Group,Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00131
Counter Claimant: Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Benefits Program, Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. Welfare Plan and others
Defendant: AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Partners' Welfare Benefits Plan, Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Plaintiff: Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC dba 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC doing business as 24 Hour COVIDRT-PCR Laboratory
Cross Defendant: OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc. and UHG, Inc, Group Benefits Plan
Cross Claimant: Envision Healthcare Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Counter Defendant: Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hebert et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00545
Defendant: Academi, Turley Law Firm, John Owen Brennan and others
Plaintiff: John Keith Hebert and International Defense Corp
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Doe v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc et al
as 4:2020cv00978
Defendant: C. A., FedEx Ground Package System Inc and V. H.
Plaintiff: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Eliason et al v. The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02747
Defendant: Bryan P Stephens, Kirton McConkie PC, Mr Craig McCullough and others
Plaintiff: The Estates of Max and Joyce Eliason and Max D Eliason
Interested Party: Brett L Eliason
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Solvet Services L L C v. H D Ventures L L C et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00861
Defendant: Christopher Walker, McKinley Investment LLC, Halen Bach and others
Plaintiff: Solvet Services LLC and Solvet Services L L C
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?