General Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 161 - 170 of 66,672
Rogers v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: Dontravian Rogers
Defendant: M.D.O.C., Unknown Defendant, Unknown Hardin and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner: Jerry Wayne Hamilton
Respondent: FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hurley v. TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00155
Petitioner: Freddy Hurley
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Cooley
as 24-30143
Petitioner: Brian Henry Pittman
Respondent: Keith Cooley, Warden
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00263
Petitioner: Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayer v. Murrill et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Petitioner: James Grayer
Respondent: Liz Murrill and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00186
Petitioner: Michael James Carson
Respondent: State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner: Reidie Jackson
Respondent: TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leal v. Lumpkin, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00372
Petitioner: Nathaniel Leal
Respondent: 371st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner: Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?