Cases 1 - 10 of 266
Vasquez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50479
Petitioner:
Edward Lopez Vasquez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lopez v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Alexandra Kristain Lopez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lopez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Alex Lopez, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Moises Lopez
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Renteria-Lopez v. Hijar
as 24-50042
Petitioner:
Jaime Renteria-Lopez
Respondent:
S. Hijar, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna
Villerreal v. Ping
as 3:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
Segundo Pastor Lopez Villerreal
Defendant:
Acting Warden L. Ping
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Renteria-Lopez v. Warden, FCI La Tuna
as 3:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Jaime Renteria-Lopez
Respondent:
Warden and Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lugo v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00131
Petitioner:
Jose Lopez Lugo
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lopez v. Lumpkin
as 7:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Christopher Phillip Lopez
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bryan Colier and Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vasquez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01279
Petitioner:
Edward Lopez Vasquez
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
