Prison Condition Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 151 - 160 of 11,453
Bailey v. Ector County Detention Center
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: Jeffery Dwayne Bailey
Defendant: Ector County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cage v. Matthew
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff: Derrick Cage
Defendant: Kerry Matthew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Guidroz et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: Dustin Lee Patterson
Defendant: Zach Guidroz, Garrett Douglas, Laura Stogner and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myles v. Irvine
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: Tyrone Myles
Defendant: Jasmyne Irvine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Brown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Steffon Graves
Defendant: Unknown Brown, Turne Key Medical Company, Sid Gautreau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff: Vincent Johnson
Defendant: Ronald Johnson and Kina T. Kimble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Hinds County, Ms. et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: Barry Wallace
Defendant: Hinds County, Ms. and Tyree Jones
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darby v. Bordelon
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Richard A. Darby
Defendant: Donnie Bordelon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hattiesburg Police Department
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: Sam M. Scott
Defendant: Hattiesburg Police Department
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. State of Louisiana
as 24-30085
Plaintiff: Lionel Edwards
Defendant / Appellee: State of Louisiana

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?