Cases 11 - 20 of 11,443
Francis v. Ouachita Parish Corrections, et al
as 3:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Henry Ray Francis
Defendant:
Ouachita Correctional Center, Unidentified Parties, Medical Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Dykes et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jenkins
Defendant:
Christopher Dykes, George Rembert, Daphane Ellis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamp v. Jane or John Doe
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Brymon Hamp, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. Chainy
as 3:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Mike Rutledge
Defendant:
Ms. Chainy
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Byrd
as 3:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Vincent Mark Castillo
Defendant:
Claire Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fallon v. Riverbend Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Stephan Enrique Fallon
Defendant:
Riverbend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Chambers, et al.
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Defendant:
Mr. Derrick Chambers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Reed
as 24-30329
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis
Defendant:
P. Reed, Captain, Joseph Westbrook, Master Sergeant, Unknown Scott, Sergeant and others
Mosley v. UFN
as 9:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Marion Ray Mosley
Defendant:
ULN UFN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. LeBlanc
as 24-30326
Plaintiff:
Ellis Reed
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Randy Lavespere, Medical Doctor, Medical Director, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Elizabeth Britton, Hep-C, Case Manager, Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
