Cases 11 - 20 of 1,006
Jones v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Eric DeJuan Jones
Defendant:
Vanessa Jones, Joseph L. Turney, George T. Holmes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Health
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Jones
Defendant:
Department of Health, Eastern Louisiana Mental Health Systems, Turn Key Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. LSP Investigation Service et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric McCall
Defendant:
LSP Investigation Service, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copelin v. Barton et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Darrius Randy Copelin
Defendant:
Ruthie Barton, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Triplett v. LeBlanc
as 24-30068
Plaintiff:
Willie Triplett
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Jacob Johnson, Randy Lavespere and others
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 24-30049
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
McGee v. Barton
as 24-30038
Plaintiff:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
Mitchell v. John Doe
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Augustus Mitchell
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Doe
as 5:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Erik Flountez Gardner
Defendant:
John Doe, Luke Henderson, Steve Rushing and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Taylor County Detention Center
as 23-11269
Plaintiff:
Dennis Haley
Defendant:
Taylor County Detention Center, Ricky Bishop, Sheriff, FNU Norette, Chief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
