Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hampton et al v. Cortez et al
as 3:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Hampton, III, Fred Johnson, Terry Mays and others
Defendant:
Patrick Page Cortez, Clay Schexnayder and John Bel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2022cv00293
Petitioner:
Michael Fred Houston
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Gooden
as 22-30321
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fred Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Gooden, Lieutenant
Wallace et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace, Fred Patmon, Timothy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Jackson County ADC et al
as 1:2021cv00231
Plaintiff:
Fred Rice
Defendant:
Jackson County ADC, Mike Ezell and Unknown McCoy
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. White et al
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Melvin Cooper, 15th District Circuit Court, Glenn L. White and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Draeshund K. Magee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00772
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy, Michael Jack, Tammy Hendrickson and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Pike County Circuit Court et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Fred Gordon, D. Smith, Clerk Roger Graves and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Gooden
as 3:2020cv00118
Plaintiff:
Fred Johnson
Defendant:
Charles Gooden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. McLeod et al
as 3:2018cv00804
Defendant:
James Spears, Unknown Bridges, Ty Unknown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Demario Dontez Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
