Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Jordan v. Houston et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Russell Houston and John Hunt
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Antonio Davon Houston
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Vital Core, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wess v. Houston et al
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Marcus Wess
Defendant:
R. Houston, Major Henderson, T. Wolfe and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murshid v. Keyes
as 22-60632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdulkhaliq M. Murshid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adrian Keyes, Russell Houston, Gladys Cooper and others
Houston v. LeBlanc
as 22-30470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scott Eric Houston
Defendant / Appellee:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections
Houston v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2022cv00293
Petitioner:
Michael Fred Houston
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. LeBlanc
as 3:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Scott Eric Houston
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Ezell et al
as 1:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Steven Latrel Houston, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Ezell and Jackson County ADC
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murshid v. Keys et al
as 1:2020cv00365
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unknown Cooper, Unknown Keys, Unknown Woodall and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulkhaliq M. Murshid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
