Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brown v. EDUC
as 22-11115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Education and Miguel Cardona, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Education
Amicus Curiae:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, State of Utah and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 22-40367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arizona, State of Alabama, State of Florida and others
State of Texas v. Yellen
as 22-10560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Mississippi and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
Janet Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, Richard K. Delmar, in his official capacity as Acting Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Taxpayers Union Foundation, Buckeye Institute, New Civil Liberties Alliance and others
Louisiana et al v.Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al
as 6:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, U S Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey C Arrington, Brian Babin, Jim Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv04370
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U S Dept of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Louisiana v. Becerra
as 21-30734
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Montana, State of Arizona and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv03970
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Montana, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
USA v. State of Texas
as 21-50949
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley and Mistie Sharp
Amicus Curiae:
State of Indiana, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Not Classified By Court:
Constitutional Accountability Center, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 21-40618
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Louisiana and Sheriff Brad Coe
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
FIEL Houston, Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
