Cases 11 - 20 of 427
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Miller v. Salvaggio
as 23-50894
Plaintiff:
Jack Miller, Annabel Campbell, Matthew Pesina and others
Defendant:
Chief Joseph Salvaggio, in his individual and official capacities, Officer Jim Wells, Detective, in his individual and official capacities, David Anderson, Lieutenant, in his official capacity and others
Fenelon et al v. Housing & Urban Development et al
as 5:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L Fenelon and Barbara Fenelon Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Housing & Urban Development, U S Dept of Justice, James Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fenelon et al v. Housing & Urban Development et al
as 6:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L Fenelon and Barbara Fenelon Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Housing & Urban Development, U S Dept of Justice, James Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jones v. King
as 23-50850
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Matthew Jones, Ysidro Renteria and William L. Jones Carr
Defendant / Appellant:
Amber M. King, Chris H. Busse and Brandon W. Jones
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Yoon v. Garg
as 23-20519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jung-Hoon Yoon
Defendant / Appellee:
Nisha Garg, Carolee King, Daniel Sharphorn and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
