Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Hawkins et al v. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 4:2018cv03052
Plaintiff:
Jamie Wasicek, Loretta Gulley, Kenetra Williams and others
Defendant:
The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Coppertree Apartments LLC and Coppertree Village Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Ware Youth Center et al
as 1:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
Tracy Williams
Defendant:
Ware Youth Center, Darqwiez Murphy, Raymond Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bishop v. Ware et al
as 4:2017cv00886
Plaintiff:
Denley Ann Bishop
Defendant:
Jennifer Ware, Anna Husfeld, Veronica Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00993
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Thomas v. Randall County et al
as 2:2017cv00133
Defendant:
Randall County , Terry Easterling , LaDonna Reining and others
Plaintiff:
Johnie Ray Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler v. Williams et al
as 4:2017cv00096
Plaintiff:
Elliott Wheeler
Defendant:
Robert Williams , Oscar Griffin , Morris Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Janine Charboneau v. Danny Davis
as 17-40462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Janine Charboneau
Defendant / Appellee:
Danny Davis, Russell Driver, James Kirk and others
Janine Charboneau v. Danny Davis, et al
as 17-40462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANINE CHARBONEAU
Defendant - Appellee:
DANNY DAVIS, RUSSELL DRIVER, JAMES KIRK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
