Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Emrit v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement et al
as 2:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Broward County State Attorney's Office, Broward County Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Jules
as 2:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Emrit v. Jules
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Emrit v. Pratt
as 23-20078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney Kara Pratt, of Hillsboro, TX, Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel (CDC), Texas Board of Disciplinary Appeals (BODA) and others
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emit and Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Texas Bar, Texas Board of Disciplinary Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ronald Emrit v. Hunter Medical Systems, Inc.
as 15-30624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTER MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
