Cases 41 - 50 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-30035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-41620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Riley v. Loggins, et al
as 4:2015cv01242
Plaintiff:
June Anne Riley
Defendant:
Amy Loggins, Sierra Batchan and Gustavo Rivera, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
St. Romain v. Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness et al
as 3:2014cv00660
Defendant:
Jim Brown, Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness, Livingston Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph St. Romain, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Larry Washington, et al v. Gwendolyn Riley, et al
as 14-30318
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LARRY WAYNE WASHINGTON, BOOKER T. WASHINGTON SUCCESSION, SR. and HELEN JONES-WASHINGTON SUCCESSION
Defendant - Appellant:
GWENDOLYN RILEY, GLENDA WASHINGTON-CHEREME, WILLIE WASHINGTON-WILLIAMS and others
Gjemre v. Leffingwell et al
as 1:2013cv00729
Defendant:
City of Austin, Sheryl Cole, Karen Kennard and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mitchell Gjemre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Riley v. Azer Texas LLC d/b/a AutoZone
as 4:2013cv01587
Plaintiff:
Edna Riley
Defendant:
Azer Texas LLC d/b/a AutoZone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
