Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Iberia Parish Government v. Romero
as 6:2014cv02985
Defendant:
Shane Romero
Plaintiff:
Government of Iberia Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Romero v. Youngsville et al
as 6:2013cv02928
Plaintiff:
Tammy Romero
Defendant:
City of Youngsville , Earl Menard , Scott Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Beck v. Parker et al
as 1:2013cv00556
Defendant:
Board Member Steven J. Austin, Board Member Mary Baty, RDH, Board Member Dr. William Birdwell and others
Plaintiff:
M.D., D.M.D. Robert Lee Beck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ducharme-Romero et al v. Chavarria
as 5:2013cv00495
Defendant:
Bexar County, Bexar County Sheriff Department and Chavarria
Plaintiff:
Heather Ducharme-Romero and Mark Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woodyard, et al v. The City of Abilene, Texas, et al
as 1:2011cv00229
Plaintiff:
Clayton Woodyard and Marnie Woodyard
Defendant:
The City of Abilene, Texas, Roger Romero, Christopher Bryan Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurignac v. Mission Police Department et al
as 7:2011cv00269
Plaintiff:
Fabian Aurignac
Defendant:
Mission Police Department , Mission Municipal Court , Omar Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
