Cases 41 - 50 of 324
Bivines v. City of Pascagoula, Mississippi et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Defendant:
Walter Ezell, City of Pascagoula, Mississippi, Matt Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Lakesha Bivines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Austin and Walter Dodds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Blackwell et al
as 2:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Demonsha R Long
Defendant:
Lisa Blackwell, Marketa Garner Walters and Department of Children & Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Dillard University
as 22-30079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyniski Evans
Defendant / Appellee:
Dillard University and Walter Kimbrough
Brown v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Howard Brown
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Department of Children and Family Services, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. et al
as 3:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake and Eric *DO NOT FILE* Drake
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, LLC., Best Buy Co., Inc., Corie Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guy v. The Town of Slaughter, et al
as 3:2021cv00660
Defendant:
Dennis Guy, Town of Slaughter, Slaughter Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Dillard University et al
as 2:2021cv02076
Plaintiff:
Tyniski Evans
Defendant:
Dillard University and Walter Kimbrough
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Nevarez v. Coleman et al
as 2:2021cv01855
Plaintiff:
Julie Nevarez and De'Andre Willis
Defendant:
Dana Coleman, John Bolgiano, Corey Duplantis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
