Cases 51 - 60 of 372
McKinney v. Johnson County Texas et al
as 3:2022cv02264
Plaintiff:
Shawna McKinney
Defendant:
Johnson County, Texas, Sheriff Adam King, David Blankenship and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farshid v. Allen Independent School District et al
as 4:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Najva Farshid
Defendant:
Allen Independent School District, Julie Young, Terreva Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bullock v. Myres et al
as 4:2022cv03223
Plaintiff:
Joan R.M. Bullock
Defendant:
Albert H. Myres, Marc C. Carter, Pamela A. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Satanic Temple v. TX Hlth and Human Svc
as 22-20459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Satanic Temple, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Health and Human Service Commission and Cecile Young
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tiner v. Young, et al
as 5:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Defendant:
Cecile Young, Texas Health and Human Services, NFN 5:22-CV-208 Hamillton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Young
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Diandra Davis and La'Dharion Davis
Defendant:
Deonta Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00272
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act - Public Accomodations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
