Cases 71 - 80 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Cantu v. Gusman et al
as 2:2011cv00824
Plaintiff:
Claudia Cantu
Defendant:
Marlin N Gusman , Samuel Gore , Jerry Ursin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Traffic Court, City of Tyler
as 2:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
Cathy Carr
Defendant:
Traffic Court, City of Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacqueline Carr v. Capital One, N.A.
as 10-31086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE CARR, in her Separate and Individual Capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPITAL ONE NA
Carr v. Capital One, N.A.
as 2:2010cv01717
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Carr
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carr v. City of Yazoo City, Mississippi et al
as 5:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
Allen Carr
Defendant:
City of Yazoo City, Mississippi , McArthur Straughter , The Fire Chief of Yazoo City, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-30084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dowdy v. College of the Mainland et al
as 4:2009cv02452
Plaintiff:
Kent Dowdy
Defendant:
College of the Mainland, Lisa Templer, Lawrence Durrence, Ph.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carr et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, L.L.C.
as 2:2009cv00127
Plaintiff:
Charles Carr and Donald Coffer
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Barbara Settle v. State of Texas, et al
as 09-20320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA YOUNGS SETTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, doing business as Legislative Branch, HARRIS COUNTY, STATUTORY PROBATE COURT NO 4 AND COUT NO 1 IN RE: ESTATE OF MAY T YOUNGS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
