Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Morrisson v. Sierra et al
as 3:2022cv02431
Plaintiff:
Alynda Dawn Morrisson
Defendant:
Archer Sierra, Mario Max Schawmberg Lippe, Daniel Winn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Marshall v. Abbott
as 22-40145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dustin Lonnie Marshall
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Individual and official capacity, Warren Kenneth Paxton, Individual and official capacity, Skibell, Bohach & Archer, P.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Archer v. New Orleans City, et al
as 2:2021cv01079
Defendant:
Kenny Prepetit, Michael Crawford, Bryan Lampard and others
Plaintiff:
Katharine Archer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Abbott et al
as 4:2021cv00384
Defendant:
Lynne Finley, Daniel Hodge, Colleton County 401st District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lonnie Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Finlay v. Archer
as 3:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Jeffrey Archer
Plaintiff:
Mark Finlay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pius Chi v. Martinez et al
as 1:2020cv00069
Respondent:
Robert Daum, Chad Wolf, Hugo R Martinez and others
Petitioner:
Munguh Pius Chi
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cholick-Cases Estate v. Harlingen Police Chiefs et al
as 1:2019cv00073
Defendant:
S. Meyer, Danny Sarna, Manny Vela and others
Plaintiff:
Cholick-Cases Estate, D.R. Cholick Estate and Cholick-Casas Estate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
