Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Culumber v. Morris Network of Mississippi, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Toni Miles Culumber
Defendant:
Morris Network of Mississippi, Inc. doing business as WXXV-TV, Morris Multimedia, Morris Network, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gonzales v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2022cv01324
Not Classified By Court:
Beto for Texas and Jackia Miles
Plaintiff:
sara gonzales
Defendant:
City of Dallas and Cynthia Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clervain et al v. Hughs et al
as 4:2022mc00612
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
