Cases 1 - 10 of 604
Marks v. City of Manvel et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Defendant:
Amanda Zawieruszynski, Taner Truit, Officer Ruiz and others
Plaintiff:
John Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Parr v. Cougle
as 24-30523
Plaintiff:
William R. McHugh, III, Rebecca Taylor and Anthony Parr
Intervenor:
Jeffery Corbin, Rick Smith, Larry Rolling and others
Defendant:
David Cougle, in his official capacity
Hassen v. Bowman
as 24-30467
Defendant:
Jordan Richard, individually and in his official capactity, Stephen J. Rogers, individually and in his official capacity, C L H G-Ruston, L.L.C., doing business as Northern Louisiana Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Alexander v. Philip R. Taft
as 24-10663
Defendant:
Nathaniel Patterson, Philip Taft, Melissa Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Alexander
Smooth Multi-Services Platform, et al., v. USA, et al.
as 4:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Smooth Multi-Services Platform, Others Unknown and Ajide Technology Corporation
Defendant:
USA, Sean Jeffrey Taylor, Jason Rennie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00383
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
