Cases 1 - 10 of 230
Est of La'Mello Parker v. MS Dept
as 24-60208
Plaintiff:
Estate of La'Mello Parker and L. S., a minor, by and through Kevin Smith his next friend, individually and on behalf of all entitled to recover
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Public Safety, Troy Peterson, Harrison County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, Harrison County, Mississippi and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Credit vs Altus Hospice etal
as 9:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Tonya Y. Credit
Defendant:
Altus Hospice, Altus Hospice of North Houston, L.P., ZT Employment Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 2:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 2:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-60449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
