Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Williams v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
JOHNELL WILLIAMS, OBO JOHARRI WALKER
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Timothy Hooper, State of Louisiana Departmet of Public Safety and Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Westbrook v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Lula Westbrook
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Kevin Farmer and Scott Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Duff et al
as 3:2023cv03095
Plaintiff:
Debra Mays Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Duff, Steven Cunningham, Bruce Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-60391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
