Cases 1 - 10 of 2,013
Woodfork v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2024cv01422
Plaintiff:
Mallory Woodfork
Defendant:
Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Clinston Gadea, Ricky Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payton v. The City of Ridgeland, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Jumanda Payton
Defendant:
The City of Ridgeland, Mississippi, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mack v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mack
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Ricky Davis, Brett McAlpin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Shields et al v. Port Arthur Independent School District et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Robin Dennis Perry Shields and Corrections Officer JOHN DOE ONE
Defendant:
Port Arthur Independent School District, Mark Porterie and Monique Bienvenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Martinez v. Harris County, TX
as 24-20194
Plaintiff:
Jose Martinez
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas, Ed Gonzalez, Deputy L. Ybarra and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
