Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Eason v. City of Senatobia et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Latonya Eason
Defendant:
City of Senatobia, Richard Chandler, Zachary Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Connelly et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Nia Mills
Defendant:
William Allen Connelly, John Gaudet, Vance Matranga, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ragland v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Shelia Ragland
Defendant:
City of Jackson, James Davis, Anthony Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tarver v. City of Denton, Texas et al
as 4:2021cv00970
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tarver
Defendant:
City of Denton, John Does 1-4, City of Denton, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Celestine v. Lafayette Consolidated Government et al
as 6:2021cv03237
Petitioner:
Gerarld Celestine
Defendant:
Lafayette Consolidated Government, Thomas Glover, Sr, Lafayette Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Celestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00752
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Heap et al
as 4:2020cv03572
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY, JOHN DOE 1 to 5, Constable Ted Heap and others
Plaintiff:
Constable Herschel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Rogers et al
as 1:2020cv00187
Defendant:
Tony Rogers, Kevin Crook, Edward Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Sierra White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rayburn v. Forrest County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00155
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4, Charlie Sims, Forrest County, Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Allen Rayburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
