Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis v. Logan et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Officer Brandon Logan, Officer William Snyder, Capt. Wes Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. City of Allen et al
as 4:2022cv00745
Plaintiff:
Cassady Ward
Defendant:
City of Allen, James O Skinner, John Doe 1-6 and others
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. Paul D. Stickney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Allen
as 5:2021cv00552
Defendant:
Officer William W. Allen
Plaintiff:
Robert Duncan Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. City of Madison, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00702
Defendant:
Officer Randy Tyler, Investigator Charles Harrison, III, SRT Commander Captain Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. The City of Madison, MS et al
as 3:2019cv00684
Defendant:
Johns Does 1-10, Madison Police Department, The City of Madison, MS and others
Plaintiff:
Nikolas Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne et al v. City of San Antonio, Texas, et al
as 5:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Amy V. Carillo, City of San Antonio, Officer Shannon Purkiss and others
Plaintiff:
Don Albert Payne and Gloria Jean Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Villanueva v. Rosenberg Police Department et al
as 4:2018cv04529
Defendant:
City of Rosenberg Police Officer Brandon Armstrong, City of Rosenberg Officer Tamara Lee Meyen, City of Rosenberg Jail and others
Claimant:
Ms. Martha Alicia Villanueva
Plaintiff:
Martha Alicia Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker et al v. Dailey et al
as 2:2011cv01385
Defendant:
Steve Dailey and Officer Williams
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Walker and Gary L. Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Dailey et al
as 2:2011cv01374
Defendant:
Steve Dailey and Officer Williams
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Dwayne Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
