Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gray v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv02426
Plaintiff:
James E Gray
Defendant:
Marie Williams, NATHANIEL Roy WILLIAMS, TOWN OF DELHI, LOUISIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed et al v. Rawlings et al
as 3:2018cv01032
Plaintiff:
Brandon Reed , Erick Green , Yafeuh Balogun Shamsid-Deen and others
Defendant:
Mike Rawlings, Scott Griggs, Adam Medrano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Audrey Coleman v. Roy Williams, Jr., et al
as 13-10165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY WILLIAMS, JR., Constable Precinct 4, DEPUTY CARL SMITH, Badge #421, SERGEANT JASON JOHNSON, Badge #404 and others
Coleman v. Williams et al
as 3:2012cv04874
Plaintiff:
Audrey Coleman
Defendant:
Roy Williams, Jr, Carl Smith, Jason Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Winegarner v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc, et al
as 12-40922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER DAVID WINEGARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, CINEMARK MOVIES 8 OF LEWISVILLE, TEXAS, SARAH VAN ZANDT, Manager and others
Peter Winegarner v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc., et al
as 12-40212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER DAVID WINEGARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, CINEMARK MOVIES 8 OF LEWISVILLE, TEXAS, SARAH VAN ZANDT, Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winegarner v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00627
Plaintiff:
Peter David Winegarner
Defendant:
Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Cinemark Movies 8 of Lewisville, TX, Sarah Van Zandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winegarner v. Cinemark USA, Movie Theaters, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv02232
Plaintiff:
Peter David Winegarner
Defendant:
Cinemark USA, Movie Theaters, Inc., Cinemark, Sarah Van Zandt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
