Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fox v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 4:2021cv02146
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Officer Demetrius Byrd, Chief Executive Officer, Director of Consumer Affairs for the DFPS/HHS and others
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Denise Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Allen et al v. LPP et al
as 2:2013cv06332
Plaintiff:
Kwan D. Allen and Jelinda Gibson Allen
Defendant:
LPP, MGC, Property Acceptance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol Paselk v. State of Texas, et al
as 13-41049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL PASELK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, HOPKINS COUNTY TEXAS, HOPKINS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, and also all unidentified associates, directors, staff, empoloyees, officers, and volunteers in their official and individual capacities and others
Taylor v. AMS Servicing et al
as 3:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Chandra Taylor
Defendant:
AMS Servicing, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Equifirst Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center, Inc. v. Shapiro
as 2:2012cv02822
Defendant:
Dean Shapiro
Plaintiff:
Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Lumpkins v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
Barbara Browder Lumpkins
Defendant:
Bank of America, Ocwen Loan Servicing Company, Shapiro & Daigrepont, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
