Cases 91 - 100 of 1,266
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01003
Petitioner:
Lowell DeQuincy Green
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. McNeil et al
as 6:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
James Jones, Squire James Jones, Jr. and Derrick Joseph Jones
Defendant:
Warden Unknown McNeil, Asst. Warden Unknown Marshall, C.O. Unknown Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
Lowell Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Green et al
as 1:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Corey Tyrone Griffin
Defendant:
Unknown Green, Unknown Bufkins and Unknown Clark
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. McBride, et al.
as 5:2023cv00949
Plaintiff:
Lowell Q. Green
Defendant:
Judge John McBride, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padieu v. Philips
as 23-40434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philippe Padieu
Defendant / Appellee:
Lisa Philips, Nurse Manager, Michael Sizemore, Senior Practice Manager, Kirt Stiefer, Warden, Beto Unit and others
Green v. Horton
as 7:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Green
Respondent:
Unknown Defendant 7:23-CV-69-O and Sheriff Sidney Kirk Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Green v. Pulliam, et al
as 5:2023cv00901
Petitioner:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Judge Jason K. Pulliam and Judge Jason K. Pulliam, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Judge Matt Johnson, et al
as 5:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Judge Matt Johnson, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Donna L. Mendez, et al
as 5:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Donna L. Mendez, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
