Cases 11 - 20 of 683
Anderson v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01751
Plaintiff:
Arthur Anderson
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holloway v. Garcia
as 23-20585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arthur R. Holloway, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Hector Garcia, Christopher Duncan, Sylvia Peterson and others
Rios v. Walters et al
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Darren Walters, Katrina White, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Morgan
as 23-10941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Lee Bell
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Terry L. Morgan, Garza County Sheriff's Office, Philip Mack Furlow, Garza County District Attorney and Arthur Aguilar, Jr., Attorney at Law
Anderson v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
Arthur Anderson
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. USA
as 5:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Arthur Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Burdette v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arthur Burdette and Scooter
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Mr. McDonald, Ms. Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniels v. USA
as 1:2023cv00298
Petitioner:
Arthur Wilson McDaniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Burdette v. Mississippi Parole Board
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arthur Burdette
Defendant:
Mississippi Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooksey v. Port Arthur Police Department
as 1:2023cv00271
Petitioner:
James Roy Cooksey
Respondent:
Port Arthur Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
