Cases 11 - 20 of 3,915
Senn v. Goss, et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Senn
Defendant:
FNU Goss, FNU Sherpitear and FNU Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Senn v. Jefferson
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Senn
Defendant:
FNU Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Funches v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dye v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Dye
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Brand Huffman, J. Canale and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Yazoo County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Banks
Defendant:
Yazoo County Sheriff Dept. and James Shires
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Shires et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Banks
Defendant:
James Shires and Y.C.S. Dept.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Saxton
as 24-40223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Rhodes
Defendant:
Garrett Saxton, Practice Manager, Rachel Burleson, Facility Nurse Manager, Tonia G. McNaughton, Nurse Practitioner and others
Pierce v. Walmart Stores et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alexander Eric Pierce
Defendant:
Walmart Stores and E Polack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Young
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber K. Ochoa, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
