Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Metcalf v. Clay et al
as 2:2015cv02548
Plaintiff:
Charles S Metcalf, Jr
Defendant:
Becky Clay and Charles Samuels, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fulton v. Samuels et al
as 3:2015cv02772
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Jermaine Fulton
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr and Warden FCI Seagoville, TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chester v. Samuels et al
as 1:2015cv00259
Petitioner:
Carl Chester
Respondent:
Charles Samuels, F Lara and USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chester v. Samuels et al
as 1:2015cv00258
Petitioner:
Carl Chester
Respondent:
Charles Samuels, F Lara and USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chester v. Samuels et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Petitioner:
Carl Chester
Respondent:
Charles Samuels, F Lara and USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bishop v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Ralph Bishop
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Jeffrey Grondolsky, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv00810
Plaintiff:
Thomas Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 14-31084
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, U.S. 3RD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, JIM BRENNAN and others
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 5:2014cv02320
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, U S 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, Jim Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard Gonzalez v. Department of Justice, et al
as 14-50382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL PEARCE, MICHAEL SCHAPPAUGH, Health Sevices Administrator, GEO FACILITY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
