Cases 11 - 20 of 555
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brent v. Cain
as 24-60044
Petitioner:
James Lee Brent
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Cain
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
James Mortez Gardner
Respondent:
Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Isby v. Cain
as 24-60003
Petitioner:
Anthony Isby
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Linicomn v. Harris County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt L Linicomn
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff Office, Harris County District Attorney Office, Harris County Commissioner Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mathis v. U S America
as 3:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Bernard Mathis
Respondent:
U S America and MDOC Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carbin v. Cain
as 23-60618
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Carbin
Respondent / Appellee:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Tate County Board of Supervisors and George C. Carlson, Jr.
Pinkston v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Commissioner Burl Cain, Kelly Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicolais v. Cheramie et al
as 2:2023cv07094
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vincent Nicolais
Defendant:
Brad Cheramie, Robert Shaw, Detective Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
