Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ted Durbin v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al
as 13-31028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TED DURBIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, DARREL VANNOY, Dept. Warden, LESLIE DUPONT, Assistant Warden and others
Conlan v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00641
Defendant:
Judge Andrew Austin, Daniel Castillo, Elizabeth Cottingham and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Durbin v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00496
Defendant:
M. Ray Anderson, Burl Cain, Jerry Goodwin and others
Plaintiff:
Ted Durbin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Stipe v. Seth Smith, et al
as 11-30849
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE STIPE
Defendant - Appellee:
SETH SMITH, CHARLENE HAYDEL, JOHN PREJEAN, Doctor and others
Jones v. Prince et al
as 3:2011cv00214
Defendant:
Unknown Durbin, Tim Hooper, James LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Stipe v. Seth Smith, et al
as 10-31072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE STIPE
Defendant - Appellee:
SETH SMITH, CHARLENE HAYDEL, JOHN PREJEAN, Dr. and others
Durbin v. Cain et al
as 3:2010cv00655
Defendant:
Unknown Barrio, K. Benjamin, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Ted Durbin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stipe v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv00576
Defendant:
Patrick Cockran, Unknown Durbin, Unknown Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Stipe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummer v. Ray et al
as 5:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Cornell Jackie Drummer
Defendant:
Maureen E. Ray, Dawn Miller, Velva L. Price and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Montgomery v. Boutee et al
as 3:2007cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ernest Montgomery
Defendant:
F. Boutee, M Vincent, K Guerin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
