Cases 11 - 20 of 8,009
Ricks v. Lumpkin
as 23-70008
Petitioner:
Cedric Allen Ricks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30750
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Vallejo v. Prator et al
as 5:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Joe Thomas Vallejo
Defendant:
Steven Prator, Rick Farris, Ms Fredieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01669
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, State of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30752
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30749
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and State of Louisiana
Wesley v. State of Louisiana
as 23-30677
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, Department of State, Louisiana Notary Association and others
Brown v. Martinez et al
as 5:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Cedric Brown
Defendant:
Rick Martinez and Giles Dalby Unit Medical Staff and Doctors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Unknown Defendants
as 3:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Martinez et al
as 4:2023cv03553
Plaintiff:
Cedric Brown
Defendant:
Rick Martinez and Giles Dalby Unit Medical Staff and Doctors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
