Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Gomez v. Kuku
as 23-40213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant / Appellee:
Odunay O. Kuku, Assistant Warden LaMorris Marshall, Assistant Warden Juan J. Nunez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gomez v. Nunez
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Odunay O Kuku and Lt A Abdulmalik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Nunez
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Juan J Nunez, J.D. Mireles and Rosalinda Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Kuku et al
as 6:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Odunay O Kuku, Assistant Warden LaMorris Marshall, Assistant Warden Juan J Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Martin
as 3:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Joel Alvarado Santiago
Defendant:
Marcus Martin
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vendrell-Santiago v. Rivers
as 3:2022cv02261
Petitioner:
Samuel Vendrell-Santiago
Respondent:
FNU Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lopez-Chavez v. United States Of America
as 2:2022cv00135
Petitioner:
Santiago Lopez-Chavez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Warden, NFN Wonders, NFN Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Antwune Ladon Jenkins
Defendant:
Warden Bruce Armstrong, Sgt. FNU Whitaker, Sgt. FNU Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
