Cases 11 - 20 of 5,914
Lee v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Jesse Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Timmothy Hooper, Unknown Darbonne, Unknown Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Randy Hinshaw
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown makers and seller of TDCJ's Algorythym computer, Unknown implementors of the unknown algorythym computor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portillo Campos v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Luis Miguel Portillo Campos
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Wingfield
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunter v. Unknown et al
as 6:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Hunter
Defendant:
Vanessa Unknown and Dr White Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Ian Colon
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knighton v. Martinez et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jared Knighton, Jared Louis Knighton, Zachary Jared Louis Knighton and others
Defendant:
T Martinez, NFN Llamas, E Abedinovic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Law Library et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
Law Library and Unknown Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparkman v. Wallace
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Sparkman
Defendant:
Sergeant Unknown Wallace
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Reed
as 24-30329
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis
Defendant:
P. Reed, Captain, Joseph Westbrook, Master Sergeant, Unknown Scott, Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
