Cases 21 - 30 of 4,894
Lavergne v. Lavespere
as 24-30317
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott Lavergne
Defendant:
Randy Lavespere, Doctor/Medical Director- Louisiana State Penitentiary, Cindy Park, Nurse Practitioner- Louisiana State Penitentiary, Brady Boudin, Respiratory Specialist - Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Martinez-Pujol v. Humphrey
as 1:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Yetmis Martinez-Pujol
Respondent:
C Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Martin v. Harrison
as 24-60238
Petitioner:
Clarence Martin
Respondent:
C. Harrison, Warden, Yazoo City Low
Smith v. J. Frago et al
as 4:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
J. Frago, Officer Harrington and Sargent C. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony R. Trejo
Defendant:
U.S. President Joe Biden, U.S. Vice President, Texas Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Warden Washington et al
as 4:2024cv01817
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Warden Washington and O.I.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Stephens
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Baker
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Jefferson County Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orellana-Hernandez v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Santos Orellana-Hernandez
Defendant:
F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
