Cases 21 - 30 of 504
Compton v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Dillion Compton
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, The TDCJ Director's Review Committe, Ronald Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sanders
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, LA Dept of Safety & Corrections, Marcus Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Brookshires Grocery et al
as 4:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Boyd Sanders, Jr.
Defendant:
Brookshires Grocery, Tarrant County Jail, Comanche County Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Doe 7:23-cv-81-O
as 7:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Letura Sanders
Defendant:
John Doe 7:23-cv-81-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Fitch et al
as 1:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
David Sanders
Respondent:
Lynn Fitch and Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Armstrong
as 23-50571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden Bruce L. Armstrong, Major Michael Voyles, Major Treyvon Hoecult and others
Sanders v. Gibson
as 23-10691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James E. Sanders
Defendant / Appellee:
Kristen Gibson, Bryan D. Reitsma, M. Barthela and others
Sanders v. Huffman
as 23-60331
Petitioner / Appellant:
Chad R. Sanders
Respondent / Appellee:
Brand Huffman, Superintendent
Sanders v. Fitch et al
as 3:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
David Sanders
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv01769
Petitioner:
Frankie Lee Sanders
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
