Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Smith v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
Tyler James Smith
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Michael Turner, Gary Holton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stephens
as 1:2015cv00836
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Albert James Smith
Respondent:
Williams Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00146
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Everett James Smith
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Dir TDCJ
as 5:2015cv00031
Petitioner:
Everett James Smith
Respondent:
Dir TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Turner
as 2:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Estus James Smith
Defendant:
Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00361
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and Buddy Caldwell
Petitioner:
Anthony James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Sollie
as 3:2014cv00322
Petitioner:
Arthur James Smith
Respondent:
Billy Sollie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Covarrubias v. Foxworth et al
as 6:2013cv00812
Plaintiff:
Jaime Covarrubias
Defendant:
Todd Foxworth, Dwayne Dewberry, Larry Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Smith et al
as 9:2013cv00216
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Joseph Brown
Defendant:
James Smith, Mark Roberts, Myra L Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sammy Woods v. James Smith, et al
as 13-20135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMMY WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR JAMES SMITH, A Goree University of Texas Medical Branch Medical Doctor, MRS. HUFFY, A Goree University of Texas Medical Branch Nurse, DICKIE RYCHETSKY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
