Cases 21 - 30 of 270
Gereb v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2011cv03418
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Gereb
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Harley Lappin, G Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zebrowski v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
David Zebrowski
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, R.E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunlap v. Lappin
as 2:2011cv01917
Plaintiff:
Anttwaine M Dunlap
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander Gessa v. Eric Holder, et al
as 11-11015
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALEXANDER RAYMOND GESSA
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General, HARLEY LAPPIN, Director Bureau of Prisons and KEITH HALL, Warden
Raymond Clifton v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 11-30994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEE CLIFTON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, GERALDO MALDONDO, JOE KEFFER and others
Ronald Plummer v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 11-30972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD RAY PLUMMER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, GERALDO MALDONDO, JOE KEFFER and others
Fisher v. Matt et al
as 1:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
David Lee Fisher
Defendant:
FNU Matt, FNU Flores, FNU Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mariano Bedolla v. Barack O'Bama, et al
as 11-10746
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIANO BEDOLLA
Respondent - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN O'BAMA, President, KAREN EDENFIELD, Warden, HARLEY LAPPIN, Director Bureau of Prisons and others
Mackey v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2011cv00883
Plaintiff:
Evaristus Mackey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Lappin et al
as 4:2011cv02217
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Dewayne Arnold
Defendant:
Harry Lappin, Joe D. Driver and Sal Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
